MSPs: getting the model right for your business

The strongest MSP relationships begin with a clear operating model, explicit ownership, aligned incentives, and a shared definition of effective support.

George Florea · July 2026

Start with the operating model

Managed service providers can give a growing company access to capabilities, coverage, and technical depth that would be difficult to build internally. They can also become an expensive source of frustration when the relationship is created without a clear operating model.

Many MSP problems are blamed on the provider. Sometimes that is justified. Just as often, the underlying problem began before the provider was selected.

The company had not decided what it expected the MSP to own, what should remain internal, how performance would be measured, or who was responsible when an issue crossed organizational boundaries.

The right MSP relationship begins with those decisions.

The first question is not which provider to hire. It is how technology should be supported and managed.

Which capabilities must remain close to the business
Which responsibilities can be assigned to a provider
Where internal ownership and provider execution need to overlap
Who makes decisions about risk, priorities, architecture, and investment
How users and business leaders will receive support

An MSP can perform important work, but it should not become the owner of the company’s technology strategy.

Management still needs someone who understands the business, sets priorities, evaluates tradeoffs, and holds the provider accountable. Outsourcing execution does not outsource responsibility.

Define ownership before services

MSP agreements often describe services in considerable detail while leaving practical ownership unclear.

Who is responsible when an application problem appears to be caused by the network? Who coordinates a response that involves the MSP, a software vendor, and an internal business owner? Who decides whether a recurring incident requires additional investment?

These are operating-model questions, not contract technicalities.

User support and escalation
Infrastructure monitoring and administration
Cybersecurity operations
Application and vendor coordination
Backup, recovery, and continuity
Technology changes and projects
Reporting and executive communication

Clear ownership reduces gaps, duplication, and the tendency for different providers to point at one another when something goes wrong.

Measure the experience, not only the SLA

Service-level agreements are useful, but they rarely tell the whole story.

A ticket can technically meet its response target while a user remains unable to work. A recurring issue can be closed repeatedly without its underlying cause being addressed. A dashboard can show acceptable performance while business leaders steadily lose confidence in technology support.

Good MSP management combines service metrics with operating context.

Whether users receive effective and consistent support
Whether recurring problems are being eliminated
Whether escalations reach the right people quickly
Whether the environment is becoming more stable and secure
Whether reporting helps management make decisions
Whether the provider is identifying problems before users experience them

Telemetry matters because it makes patterns visible. The objective is not simply to collect more measurements. It is to use evidence to find root causes and improve the experience of the business.

Align incentives with the outcome

An MSP’s commercial model influences its behavior.

Pricing based primarily on labor can reward activity rather than prevention. An overly rigid fixed-fee model can create pressure to minimize effort. Project exclusions and unclear service boundaries can turn necessary work into a stream of unexpected charges.

There is no single pricing model that works for every company. The important question is whether the commercial structure supports the behavior the company expects.

What is included in the recurring service
What requires separate approval
How projects and material changes are handled
How consumption or growth affects pricing
What information the company can access
How performance problems are escalated and corrected

Predictability is valuable, but transparency and alignment are more important than the appearance of a simple price.

Treat onboarding as a critical phase

Even the right provider can struggle when onboarding is rushed or poorly governed.

The transition should establish more than technical access. It should confirm responsibilities, document the environment, validate monitoring, clarify escalation paths, introduce the provider to business stakeholders, and identify unresolved risks.

A verified understanding of the technology environment
Clear support and escalation procedures
Working monitoring and reporting
Defined security and administrative access
A prioritized list of inherited risks and issues
Agreement on the first improvements to pursue

This is also the point when assumptions made during provider selection meet operating reality. Gaps should be addressed openly rather than carried into steady-state service.

Select for fit

The largest provider is not automatically the best provider. Neither is the provider with the longest service catalog or the most polished sales process.

The right fit depends on the company’s complexity, internal capabilities, operating expectations, risk profile, and growth plans.

A provider should be able to support the environment the company has today while helping it prepare for what comes next. It should communicate clearly with both technology and business leaders. Most importantly, it should demonstrate that it understands the responsibility it is being asked to accept.

The goal is not simply to outsource technology work.

It is to create a support model in which responsibilities are clear, performance is visible, problems are resolved at their source, and the business can rely on technology without being consumed by it.

Bring the situation into focus.

If this perspective connects to something you are working through, we would be glad to start a conversation.

Connect with 100 Day →